The Ethics of Food Advertising Targeted Toward Children: Parental Viewpoint

O Springer 2009 diary of air ethical motive (2010) 91299311 DOI 10. 1007/s10551-009-0084-2 The Ethics of forage publicise Tar limited Toward Children P arntal Viewpoint ABSTRACT. The electric s seducerrens commercialize has become signifi savings bankly more than importpismire to marketers in recent age. They birth been fall outing increase amounts on announce, peculiarly of aliment and beverages, to r singularly this discussion section. At the same time, there is a critical delve among p arnts, political science agencies, and industry experts as to the moral philosophy of feed denote practices aimed toward nipperren. The present study examines p bents honest views of aliment publicise targeting children.Findings indicate that p atomic number 18nts beliefs concerning at least some dimensions of righteous fervency atomic number 18 signifi hypocrisyly cogitate to their good judgments and demeanoral intentions of nutrition announce targeting children as well as the perceived moral glitz of the fleck. trace WORDS parents, children, ethics, sustenance publicise The childrens market has become signi? bankly of the essence(predicate) to marketers (McNeal, 1998). Many marketers spend millions of dollars on advertisement to reach this growing segment (Jardine and Wentz, 2005). more(prenominal) speci? cally, nutrient and beverage companies in the USA spend an estimated US $1012 billion targeting hildren and adolescents (McKay, 2005). According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, children are exposed to more than 7,600 commercials on candy, cereal, and prof physical exertion pabulum in any given year (Kotz, 2007). The effects of announce on children have been highly debated among various groups, including parents, researchers, industry experts, and g overning body agencies. One of the primary debates has been the electric electromotive force move of food advertising direct at children. A variety of institutions are involve d in this debate. Some of these organizations such as planetary advocacy groups criticize the food companies and elevision networks concerning the increase amounts spent as well as the types of promotional efforts targeted Aysen Bakir Scott J. Vitell at children (York, 2007). notwithstandingmore, statistics provide substantial concern round(predicate) fleshiness, showing that approximately 50% of elementary- tame children and 80% of teenagers leave alone involvement obesity during their lifetime. There is as well debate among practitioners on advertising practices say at children, with even merchandise professionals indicating concern about advertising targeted at children. When interviewed, 35% of them consider the general honest and moral tandards in the industry to be lower than in the past, with 40% believing that these standards are about the same (Grimm, 2004). Thus, exactly 25% believe the standards are improved. Some companies have already started taking live up tos to deal with criticisms and even with government warning. In europium, soft-drink companies have developed self-regulatory measures to stop advertising junk food and to help tackle child obesity. To avoid stricter laws, soft-drink companies have pledged to stop marketing towards children under 12 old age old. The companies in addition have pledged to limit soft-drink sales at schools (Wentz, 005). Other countries in Europe, however, have been taking an even stricter military capability on regulations for example, starting in 2005, Ireland introduced a ban on celebrities who appear in food and beverages targeted at children (Jardine and Wentz, 2004). Furthermore, some companies have alike responded to government calls by promoting alert lifestyles when targeting children in food ads. McDonalds, in the UK, ran a campaign that featured Ronald McDonald and utilise animated fruit and vegetable characters which were called Yums. These characters urged children to eat right and stay active (Jardine and Wentz, 2004).Given all these statistics showing the potential impact of food advertising targeting children, parents 300 Aysen Bakir and Scott J. Vitell are concerned over whether or not marketers have been conducting estimable practices in promoting their products. However, this issue has not received signi? toss trouble in the marketing literature. This paper attempts to ? ll this apparent gap by examining parents respectable views of food advertising targeted at children. In doing so, it likewise examines the potential impact of parents positionings toward food advertising and toward the aim of sustainment information on their thical judgments and behavioural intentions. Marketing ethics and advertising to children publicize to children has long been one of the most controversial areas of marketing. The debate ranges from whether or not it is even respectable to advertise to children and includes the types of advertising practices that big businessman be considered honest. At the plaza of this debate is food advertising targeted at children. The impact of advertising to children has been shown in previous studies (Goldberg and Gorn, 1974 Gorn and Goldberg, 1977). Findings include the concomitant that low-income children exposed to a commercial just nce had favorable emplacements towards the advertised product (Gorn and Goldberg, 1977). Furthermore, these authors prove that exposure to television set ads among 5- and 6-year-old children directly in? uenced breakfast food and snack preferences (Goldberg et al. , 1978). Finally, exposure to advertisements has also been shown to in? uence the frequency of snacking among children (Bolton, 1983). advertise has been criticized for promoting materialism, persuading privates to buy things they do not need, and providing false or misleading information (Pollay and Mittal, 1993). Parents concerns toward the impact of advertising directed at hildren have risen signi? cant ly in the last decade (Hudson et al. , 2008). These concerns have also been expressed by academicians (Moore, 2004). However, only a limited figure of studies have examined honest issues aimed at the childrens segment (Ahuja et al. , 2001 Hudson et al. , 2008). condescension these increased concerns and the ensuing debate, parents honourable views of food advertising targeting children have not been examined in the marketing literature. estimable judgments and behavioural intentions Understanding how parents view and make decisions about ethical issues targeted at children is important to marketers.Several factors cleverness in? uence ethical decision- devising, including business officeal factors (Hunt and Vitell, 1986) and unmarried(a) differences (Hunt and Vitellm, 1986 Jones, 1991). estimable (or unethical) behavior is in? uenced directly by the ethical judgments and behavioral intentions of the individuals. An individuals ethical judgment is de? ned as the degree to which he or she considers a pop outicular behavior morally acceptable (Bass et al. , 1999, p. 189). Ethical judgments have been considered a central get in several(prenominal) ethical decision qualification models (Dubinsky and Loken, 1989 Hunt and Vitell, 1986 Jones, 1991).These decision-making theories provide an understanding of how an individuals behavioral intentions and ethical judgments are relevant to making decisions in situations involving ethical issues for example, the theory of reasoned satisfy suggests that individuals act in a manner tenacious with their emplacements. On the other hand, other factors cleverness ca social function individuals to develop behavioral intentions that might be conflicting with their spots (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975). Past research has also shown that individuals are more apparent to state their behavioral intentions if they perceive the situation as ethical (Bass et al. , 1999).Furthermore, Hunt and Vitell (1986, p. 9) de? ned beha vioral intentions as the likelihood that any particular alternative provide be chosen. The authors also suggest that ethical judgments would impact the individual behavior through behavioral intentions. Overall, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions are important pisss to gain insights regarding advertising directed at children. office toward food advertising As noted, research examining parents attitudes toward advertising, particularly to food advertising, directed at children is limited. Past studies examined the birth among family communication atterns and parental re exploits toward advertising (Rose et al. , 1998), and parental involvement The Ethics of Food publicize Targeted Toward Children and authoritative parenting and attitude toward advertising (Carlson and Grossbart, 1988). Only one study examined the transactionhip in the midst of attitude toward food advertising and parental styles (Crosby and Grossbart, 1984). The authors found differences regarding attitudes toward food advertising based upon parental styles, with more authoritative parents being more concerned about childrens food advertising as compared with more permissive parents.Governments and health advocates in different countries are trying to introduce stricter regulations on food advertising targeting children since they blame marketers for increased levels of childhood obesity. In France, food marketers are faced with choosing between paying a 1. 5% tax on their ad budgets to ancestry healthy- feeding messages or else adding a health message to commercials. In Canada, one-third of children between 2 and 11 years old are overweight and some marketers are promoting healthy lifestyles for children. Given the different proportions of childhood obesity problems from ne county to the next, multinational food marketers such as McDonalds now have differing st browsegies in each country based on how they must undertake this global challenge (Jardine and Wentz, 2005). Clear ly, advertisers have been questioned about their ethical standards. Although there is increased discussion among parents regarding the potential impact of advertising and concern about how ethical (or unethical) advertising practices are towards children, this issue has not been adequately researched. Since the relationship between parents attitude toward food advertising and ethical judgments and behavioral intentions f the advertising tactics targeted at children has not been examined in the marketing literature, this study focuses on those parental perspectives. Therefore, based upon the previous discussion, it is hypothesized that Parents attitude toward food advertising result be positively connect to to their ethical judgments of the food advertising targeted at children. H2 Parents attitude toward food advertising will be positively link to their behavioral intentions of the food advertising targeted at children. H1 301 perspective toward use of aliment information col ligates about childrens nutrition include multiple actors. Some of these concerns are centered on nutrition de? ciencies in childrens forages due to economic factors, poor eating habits, and inadequate nutritional knowledge of parents. The government has interpreted several steps to deal with childrens nutrition problems by being involved in school lunch programs, regulation of childrens advertising, and nutrition education in schools (Crosby et al. , 1982). look for has also shown the positive impact of parental in? uence and nutrition education (Grossbart et al. , 1982). Parents attitudes toward the use of nutrition vary from one parent to the other.Furthermore, parents, particularly mothers, wield a signi? cant impact on childrens consumption of a balanced diet and exposure to a variety of foods. Previous research has shown that mothers who endorsed nutrition information had more positive attitudes toward nutrition and expressed more concerns about food advertising targeted at children (Crosby et al. , 1982). Therefore, it is further hypothesized that Parents attitude toward the use of nutrition information will be positively tie in to their ethical judgments of the food advertising targeted at children. H4 Parents attitude toward the use of nutrition nformation will be positively connect to their behavioral intentions of the food advertising targeted at children. H3 virtuous intensity Jones (1991) de? nes moral intensity as the extent of issue-related moral imperative in a situation (p. 372). Furthermore, he suggests that ethics-related contexts vary with their level of moral intensity. Jones (1991) identi? ed sixer categories (order of magnitude of consequences, probability of effect, temporal immediacy, parsimony of effect, proximity, and sociable consensus) of the moral intensity construct. The ? rst four items refer to the various dimensions of disability the action might cause.More speci? cally, magnitude of consequences refers to the cumulati ve 302 Aysen Bakir and Scott J. Vitell detriment (or lack thereof) the action might cause. Probability of effect refers to the likelihood that the action will cause vilify (or lack thereof). Temporal immediacy refers to the length of time between the present and the infringement of consequences of the moral act in question (shorter length of time implies greater immediacy) (Jones, 1991, p. 376). The concentration of effect refers to the number of people who would believe that the action would cause harm (or lack thereof). Proximity is the nip of nearness social, cultural, psychological, or physical) (Jones, 1991, p. 376) that the individual has for those unnatural by the action in question. Finally, social consensus is the extent of the feeling that action taken is good (or not). Moral intensity is a multidimensional construct that measures the moral intensity of the situation. Ethical decision-making suffice must be in? uenced by the knowledge that the potential action has a moral or ethical facet that needs to be evaluated (Barnett, 2001). For marketing practitioners, studies have shown that perceived moral intensity affects the perception of ethical problems in various situations Singhapakdi et al. , 1996a Singhapakdi et al. , 1999). Furthermore, past studies also have shown that moral intensity in? uences behavioral intentions of the individuals in ethics-related situations (Robin et al. , 1996 Singhapakdi et al. , 1996a). Also, Hunt and Vitell (1986) suggest a theoretical link between intentions and ethical judgments. Therefore, moral intensity would also be expected to in? uence ethical judgments. The relationship between moral intensity and ethical judgments and behavioral intentions has also been empirically shown (Barnett, 2001 Vitell et al. , 2003). Thus, it is hypothesized thatParents attitude toward moral intensity will be positively related to their ethical judgments of the food advertising targeted at children. H6 Parents attitude toward moral intensity will be positively related to their behavioral intentions of the food advertising targeted at children. H5 contexts (e. g. , Singhapakdi et al. , 1996c Singhapakdi et al. , 1999). Forsyth (1980) suggests that high-mindedness and relativism can be considered as individual differences that might impact individuals judgments of moral issues. noble-mindedness measures an individuals acceptance of universal moral absolutes. This construct focuses on the assumption that, if ight actions are taken, this will lead to desired outcomes. On the other hand, relativism measures individuals rejection of universal moral tenets (Forsyth, 1980). Therefore, the conceptualization of these constructs might suggest that individuals who are more magisterial would be more likely to have higher ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Previous research provides some support for these relationships (Singhapakdi et al. , 1996c). Relativism is de? ned as a belief that moral standards ar e carnal knowledge to ones culture or society. Forsyth (1992) also indicates that relativistic individuals might ormulate their decisions based on skepticism and evaluate situations based on other than ethical principles. Furthermore, relativistic individuals evaluate what is right or ruin based on the speci? cs of the situation (Park, 2005). Forsyth (1992) also indicates that idealism and relativism are not contrary concepts, but rather in leechlike of each other for example, an individual might have high scores both on idealism and relativism, which indicates that the person might simultaneously accept absolute moral rules and yet also evaluate the alternatives available based upon the speci? c situation and its possible onsequences. Therefore, parents would evaluate each of the advertising tactics directed at their children on a situation-by-situation earth. Since food advertising directed at children has received signi? cant attention recently due to the health concerns of ch ildren and increased obesity rates (York, 2007), speci? c types of advertising tactics such as potentially developing foamy eating habits might be received more negatively due to their apparent impact on children. Therefore, it is hypothesized that Parents idealism will be related to their ethical judgments of the food advertising targeted at hildren. H8 Parents idealism will be related to their behavioral intentions of the food advertising targeted at children. H7 Idealism and relativism Idealism and relativism have been utilise to measure moral philosophies in various marketing-related The Ethics of Food Advertising Targeted Toward Children Parents relativism will ethical judgments of the geted at children. H10 Parents relativism will behavioral intentions of targeted at children. H9 be related to their food advertising tarbe related to their the food advertising Method Sample The vignette was sent to parents at several schools ocated in the Midwest. The researchers contacted t he schools and got permission to send the survey to parents at the schools that agreed to participate in the study. The number of schools that participated in the study provided signi? cant diversity in terms of economic background. The majority of the sample included educated and employed middle-income families. Of the 1,020 surveys sent, 189 surveys were bonkd, for a response rate of 18. 52%. Of the 189 surveys, 28 surveys had missing data for individual questions. Among the respondents, 78% were mothers and the rest of were fathers. Table I isplays the complete demographics of the respondents. Procedure in one case the school principals gave permission, the researchers contacted the teachers from kindergarten to eighth grade. The teachers in each grade sent the questionnaires home to parents with the children. Once the parents ? lled out the questionnaires, the children returned the completed questionnaire to the schools. Measures and reliability The dependent variables were be havioral intentions and ethical judgments. The independent variables were moral intensity, idealism, relativism, attitude toward food advertising aimed at children, and ttitude toward the parents use of nutrition information. 303 TABLE I Demographics of the respondents Variable Parent Mother become Age of the parent 29 years old or under 3039 years old 4049 years old 5059 years old information level of the parent High-school degree Some college degree College graduate Some graduate study receive degree Household income (US $) 100k Work status of the parent Working full time Working part time Not working No. of children One child Two children Three children Four children More than four children % 78. 1 21. 9 4. 8 48. 9 39. 8 6. 5 5. 4 19. 4 38. 7 5. 4 31. 2 12. 2 14. 5 26. 6 3. 9 22. 8 67. 9 17. 1 15 18. 7 42. 2 27. 3 7. 5 4. 3 Moral intensity This graduated table measures parents attitude toward moral intensity in a given situation. This construct was developed by Jones (1991) a nd includes six dimensions. However, the scale employ to measure the construct was developed by Singhapakdi et al. (1996b). Responses were measurable by a seven-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The harm dimension included tether variables magnitude of consequences, temporal immediacy, and concentration of effect. The other two items were proximity and social consensus.The reliability of the harm scale was 0. 85 for the 304 Aysen Bakir and Scott J. Vitell ?rst scenario, 0. 91 for the second scenario, and 0. 86 for the third scenario. Idealism and relativism This scale measures the extent of individuals acceptance of moral absolutes, whereas the relativism scale measures the extent of individuals rejection of universal moral principles. The two scales were developed by Forsyth (1980). The ten items for each scale were heedful utilizing a seven-point Likerttype scales, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The re liability of the scale was 0. 83 or idealism and 0. 84 for relativism. Attitude toward food advertising This scale measures parents attitudes toward food advertising directed at children. The scale is adapted from a Carlson and Grossbart (1988) study and includes six items. The parents extent of agreement was measured by a ? ve-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The reliability of the scale was 0. 80. Attitude toward use of nutritional information This scale measures parents use of nutritional information. The scale was originally developed by Moorman (1998) and includes four items.The parents extent of agreement toward the use of nutritional information were measured by a ? ve-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The reliability of the scale was 0. 82. Scenarios This study utilized one-third scenarios to measure parents behavioral intentions and ethical judgments carnal knowledge to spe ci? c situations. Ethical judgments and behavioral intentions were then measured by utilize a seven-point Likert scale convey the respondents the extent they agree/disagree with the questions. For measuring ethical judgments, the following statement was used, I consider the action taken to e very ethical, whereas for measuring behavioral intentions, the following statement was used, I would be likely to take the same action in this situation. Therefore, a greater degree of agreement with the action taken indicates that the respondents had higher ethical levels of behavioral intentions and ethical judgments. At the end of each scenario, the action taken by an advertiser was presented. The scenarios focused on addressing some of the current advertising practices used to target children. The ? rst scenario addresses the use of advergames targeting children. Children are play these games n the meshwork in a branded context. The games provide product-related information and even a sk children to contact their friends. The second scenario focused on some of the highly debated advertising practices at schools. A food high society sponsors programs at schools and child headache centers. During visits, the smart set provides diversion with well-known characters and exposes children to samples of their potentially unhealthy food products. The third scenario centers on a candy and cereal company who is considering selling books that spotlight the clients brand. Children can play and learn counting by using prick-? led sweets and cereals. The books use the companys brand as an example in their plays and counting. The scenarios were pretested. The results indicated that most respondents believed that the actions taken by the advertisers in all of the scenarios were unethical. The majority of the respondents also indicated that they disagreed with the actions taken in the three scenarios. Data analysis and results The hypotheses were tested separately for each of the three scenarios. abridgment of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the hypotheses. H1 measured whether parents attitude toward food advertising is ositively related to their ethical judgments of the food advertising targeted at children. The three scenarios tested did not indicate signi? cant differences. The ANOVA results were scenario 1 F(7, 152) = 26. 836, p 0. 926 scenario 2 F(7, 158) = 11. 334, p 0. 933 and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 21. 468, p 0. 724. Thus, parents attitude toward food advertising was not related to their ethical judgments of the food advertising targeted at children. H2 measured whether parents attitude toward food advertising is positively related to their behavioral intentions of the food advertising targeted at children.Again, none of the three scenarios resulted in signi? cant differences. The Ethics of Food Advertising Targeted Toward Children 305 TABLE II ANOVA analysis scenarios 1, 2, and 3, dependent variable ethical judgments Variable Moral intens ity Moral intensity Moral intensity Idealism Relativism Attitude toward Attitude toward Scenario 1 p regard as harm consensus proximity food advertising use of nutrition Scenario 2 p Value Scenario 3 p Value 0. 000 0. 095 0. 288 0. 206 0. 200 0. 926 0. 093 F(7, 152) = 26. 835 0. 000 0. 037 0. 772 0. 166 0. 006 0. 933 0. 822 F(7, 158) = 11. 334 0. 000 0. 000 0. 255 0. 633 0. 60 0. 724 0. 127 F(7, 160) = 21. 468 TABLE III ANOVA analysis scenarios 1, 2, and 3, dependent variable behavioral intentions Variable Moral intensity Moral intensity Moral intensity Idealism Relativism Attitude toward Attitude toward Scenario 1 p Value harm consensus proximity food advertising use of nutrition Scenario 2 p Value Scenario 3 p Value 0. 000 0. 000 0. 091 0. 732 0. 162 0. 854 0. 223 F(7, 153) = 18. 707 0. 000 0. 002 0. 539 0. 186 0. 036 0. 643 0. 116 F(7, 157) = 17. 721 0. 000 0. 005 0. 809 0. 567 0. 081 0. 554 0. 004 F(7, 160) = 16. 315 The ANOVA results were scenario 1 F(7, 153) = 8. 707, p 0. 8 54 scenario 2 F(7, 157) = 17. 721, p 0. 643 and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 16. 315, p 0. 554. Thus parents attitude toward food advertising was not related to their behavioral intentions relative to the food advertising targeted at children. Tables II and III display these ? ndings. H3 measured whether parents attitude toward the use of nutrition information is positively related to their ethical judgments of the food advertising targeted at children. The three scenarios tested did not indicate signi? cant differences. The ANOVA results were scenario 1 F(7, 152) = 26. 35, p 0. 093 scenario 2 F(7, 158) = 11. 334, p 0. 822 and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 21. 468, p 0. 127. H4 measured whether parents attitude toward the use of nutrition information is positively related to their behavioral intentions relative to the food advertising targeted at children. There were no signi? cant differences regarding the ? rst two scenarios, but there were signi? cant differences on the third scenario am ong parents attitude toward the use of nutrition information and its relation to their behavioral intentions of the food advertising targeted at children. The ANOVA esults were scenario 1 F(7, 153) = 18. 707, p 0. 223 scenario 2 F(7, 157) = 17. 721, p 0. 116 and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 16. 315, p 0. 004. H5 measured whether parents attitude concerning moral intensity is positively related to their ethical judgments of the food advertising targeted at children. Moral intensity was measured by three separate dimensions harm, social consensus, and proximity. There were signi? cant differences on the harm construct among three scenarios. The ANOVA results were scenario 1 F(7, 152) = 26. 836, p 0. 000 scenario 2 F(7, 158) = 11. 334, p 0. 000 306Aysen Bakir and Scott J. Vitell and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 21. 468, p 0. 000. Furthermore, there were signi? cant differences on the social consensus construct for the second and third scenarios. The ANOVA results were scenario 1 F(7, 152) = 26. 836, p 0. 095 scenario 2 F(7, 158) = 11. 334, p 0. 037 and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 21. 468, p 0. 000. Finally, there were no signi? cant differences on proximity among three scenarios. The ANOVA results were scenario 1 F(7, 152) = 26. 836, p 0. 288 scenario 2 F(7, 158) = 11. 334, p 0. 772 and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 21. 468, p 0. 55. Thus, overall H5 was at least partially supported. H6 measured whether parents attitude concerning moral intensity is positively related to their behavioral intentions relative to the food advertising targeted at children. Parents attitude toward the harm and social consensus dimensions indicated signi? cant differences among three scenarios. The ANOVA results for harm were scenario 1 F(7, 153) = 18. 707, p 0. 000 scenario 2 F(7, 157) = 17. 721, p 0. 000 and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 16. 315, p 0. 000. The ANOVA results for social consensus were scenario 1 F(7, 153) = 18. 707, p 0. 00 scenario 2 F(7, 157) = 17. 721, p 0. 002 and scenario 3 F(7 , 160) = 16. 315, p 0. 005. On the other hand, parents attitude toward proximity did not indicate any signi? cant differences among three scenarios. The ANOVA results for proximity were scenario 1 F(7, 153) = 18. 707, p 0. 091 scenario 2 F(7, 157) = 17. 721, p 0. 539 and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 16. 315, p 0. 809. H7 measured whether parents idealistic moral philosophy is related to their ethical judgments of the food advertising targeted at children. Parents idealism was not signi? cantly related to their ethical udgments. The ANOVA results for idealism were scenario 1 F(7, 152) = 26. 835, p 0. 206 scenario 2 F(7, 158) = 11. 334, p 0. 166 and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 21. 468, p 0. 633. H8 measured whether parents idealistic moral philosophy is related to their behavioral intentions of the food advertising targeted at children. Again the results were not signi? cant. The ANOVA results for idealism were scenario 1 F(7, 153) = 18. 707, p 0. 732 scenario 2 F(7, 157) = 17. 721, p 0 . 186 and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 16. 315, p 0. 567. H9 measured whether parents relativistic moral hilosophy is related to their ethical judgments of the food advertising targeted at children. H10 mea- sured whether parents relativistic moral philosophy is related to their behavioral intentions of the food advertising targeted at children. H9 and H10 were partially supported. Parents relativism was signi? cantly related to ethical judgments and intentions for the second scenario. The ANOVA results for idealism were scenario 1 F(7, 152) = 26. 835, p 0. 200 scenario 2 F(7, 158) = 11. 334, p 0. 006 and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 21. 468, p 0. 060. There were no signi? ant differences among parents relativism regarding the behavioral intentions for the ? rst and the third scenarios. The ANOVA results for relativism were scenario 1 F(7, 153) = 18. 707, p 0. 7162 scenario 2 F(7, 157) = 17. 721, p 0. 036 and scenario 3 F(7, 160) = 16. 315, p 0. 081. raillery This paper examined parents views of the ethics of food advertising targeted at children. The marketing literature, surprisingly, has not examined this topic. This study attempts to ? ll this gap by examining how parents view various types of food advertising directed at children. Children as consumers have ecome signi? cantly more important to marketers in the last decade. Marketers have heavily promoted their products to this segment and spent millions of dollars on advertising to reach this segment (Jardine and Wentz, 2005). Food advertising represents a signi? cant portion of all advertising spending for marketers while food advertising targeted at children has received signi? cant criticism from both parents and public policy-makers. The ? ndings of the study provide fire insights. Parents were asked to respond to three different scenarios outlining various food advertising strategies directed at children.Furthermore, parents ethical judgments and behavioral intentions were measured for the three scenar ios. One of the independent variables was parents attitude toward food advertising. The ? ndings indicated that parents attitude toward food advertising did not affect their ethical judgments and behavioral intentions concerning speci? c food advertising directed at their children. One of the reasons for not ? nding a signi? cant relationship might be due to the measurement of other food advertising practices targeted at children in the scenarios that was not included in the The Ethics of Food Advertising Targeted Toward Children cale measuring attitudes toward food advertising. This ? nding provides important implications for marketers which might indicate that parents evaluate speci? c food advertising targeted at children independently of their potential views on general food advertising directed at children. Thus, marketers who are cognizant of the potential harm of advertising to children might still be highly regarded by consumers even if the consumer, in general, has negative or skeptical views of advertising to children. Parents attitude toward the use of nutrition information displayed interesting ? ndings.The third scenario, in particular, focused on speci? c implications of a food product that might have unhealthy eating implications for children. Parents attitude toward the use of nutritional information for this scenario was related to their behavioral intentions. On the other hand, there were no signi? cant relationships between an attitude toward the use of nutrition and ethical judgments of food advertising targeted at children for any of the scenarios, including scenario 3. Parents might have not perceived using well-known characters to distribute food company products at schools and child care acilities to have any potential harm. The lack of a relationship between an attitude toward the use of nutritional information and ethical judgments of food advertising targeted at children should be considered on a scenario-by-scenario basis for exampl e, for the ? rst scenario, it might be that parents did not really think the advergames and the use of well-known characters to distribute food company products at schools and child care facilities presented any potential unethical practices. Particularly, advergames are new promotional tools used on the Web to attract adults and children within a branded context.Advergames are somewhere between advertising and computer games and include product-related information from the companies with the use of games or part of a game (Nelson, 2002 Mallinckrodt and Mizerski, 2007). Past studies also suggest that advergames might be more persuasive for young children than traditional advertising (Oanh Ha, 2004). Parental ken of advergames targeting children needs further investigation in future research. Future research should also examine how parents use nutritional information in their food purchase decisions to have a better understanding of the relationship between attitude 307 oward use of nutrition information and ethical perspectives regarding food advertising. Moral intensity signi? cantly affected parents ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. This ?nding offers signi? cant implications for marketers and public policy-makers. Parents indicated concerns regarding the potential harm of various food advertising targeting children in the three scenarios. It is important that marketers should be more careful when they create their advertising tactics targeting children. It might also be that more regulations might be needed to address parental concerns regarding the potential effects of food dvertising. The moral intensity measure of proximity was not signi? cantly related to the ethical judgments and behavioral intentions of parents. Proximity measures the feeling of nearness (social, cultural, psychological, or physical) (Jones, 1991, p. 376) that the individual has for those affected by the action in question. It might be that parents considered the action ta ken unethical whether the results affected their friends/relatives or not. The ?ndings relative to social consensus and its effect on their ethical judgments and behavioral intentions were signi? cant, in most instances.Thus, parents did consider what others might think about a speci? c situation when forming their ethical judgments and intentions. The ethical perspectives of idealism and relativism also provide some insights regarding parents ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Findings indicated that there is no signi? cant relationship between parents attitude toward idealism and their ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Parents, in this study, may not have perceived the scenarios as situations that should carry universal moral absolutes. On the other hand, parents attitude toward relativism signi? antly affected their ethical judgments and behavioral intentions but only for the second scenario. Relativism might be more likely to in? uence opinions on a situatio n-by-situation basis. The second scenario in particular expressed potential unhealthy effects on children. Therefore, parents might have perceived this scenario as involving questionable ethical practices. Our study has some limitations. Although parents were instructed to ? ll out the questionnaire individually or as a couple, we could not verify whether or not they communicated with each other. This raises the 308 Aysen Bakir and Scott J.Vitell possibility of a potential demand artifact. Secondly, although survey methods provide important information on individuals perceptions and beliefs, qualitative methods would bestow more slender information on parents perceptions and attitudes. Future research should focus on more qualitative techniques to have a deeper understanding of perceptions and attitudes. Third, our ? ndings provide insights only from parents in the Midwestern USA. These ? ndings are not yet generalizable to other cultures or subcultures. Understanding parents persp ectives on advertising directed at children is important.Future research should focus on a more detailed parental perspective to uncover how parents make judgments on whether advertising directed at children is ethical or not. Qualitative studies might provide more in-depth understanding. Uncovering these issues might minimize the discrepancy between parents and marketers. The debate on the effects of food advertising targeted at children has intensi? ed in the last several years among academicians, public policy-makers, and marketers. Companies need to respond better to the food-related debates in society, particularly to those related to healthy eating and ethical food marketing.In conclusion, our ? ndings assist both research and theory in the childrens advertising ? eld. With the increasing prominence of ethics in business/ marketing research, this study presents important ?ndings that advance our understanding of the potential antecedents to the ethical decision-making process for parents in situations involving advertising directed toward their children. We trust that the results generated by this research can be successfully used to guide future ethics research projects in this growing ? eld. appendage A scenarios Scenario 1 A food company whose products are, in part, argeted at children is planning to use adver- games (online games in which a companys product or brand characters are featured). It is also considering encouraging children to contact their friends about a speci? c product or brand as part of their new advertising campaign. The company is considering using the internet, rather than more traditional media such as television, due to the highly debated relationship between aggressive food advertising and increased obesity among children. accomplish The company decided to use Internet advertising for their new campaign. Scenario 2An advertising agency recommended that their client sponsor programs at schools and visit child care centers. The se sponsored programs would make a ?nancial contribution to each school and child care center. During these visits the company would provide entertainment with the companys wellknown characters and provide a sample of the companys food products to children. If they do this, children who are less than 5 years old would be introduced to a range of products that might be considered unhealthy. Action The sponsor decided to conduct these visits to the child care centers/schools and provide a sample of their products.Scenario 3 A candy and cereal company is considering selling books that spotlight the clients brand. These childrens books provide fill on counting and playing. Children can play checkers with various fruit-? avored candies and can learn to count using various forms of calorie and sugar-? lled sweets and cereals. The books use the companys brand as an example for the counting and playing content. Action The candy and cereal company decided to sell these books to children. The Ethics of Food Advertising Targeted Toward Children Appendix B scale items 309 APPENDIX B continued Moral intensity 4.The overall harm (if any) do as a result of the action would be very trivial Harm 2 The action will harm very few people, if any Harm 3 The action will not cause any harm in the immediate future Proximity If one were a ain friend of the person(s) harmed, the action would be wrong Social Most people would agree that the action is consensus wrong 5. Harm 1 6. 7. 8. Idealism 9. 1. A person should make certain that their actions neer intentionally harm some other even to a small degree 2. Risks to another should never be tolerated, irrespective of how small the risks might be 3. The existence of potential harm to others is always rong, irrespective of the bene? ts gained 4. One should never psychologically or physically harm another person 5. One should not perform an action which might in anyway threaten the dignity and welfare of another individual 6. If an ac tion could harm an naive other, then it should not be done 7. Deciding whether or not to perform an act by balancing the positive consequences of the act against the negative consequences of the act is immoral 8. The dignity and welfare of people should be the most important concern of any society 9. It is never necessary to sacri? ce the welfare of others 10.Moral actions are those which closely match ideals of the most perfect action 10. Attitude toward food advertising 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 3. There are no ethical principles that are so important that they should be part of any code of ethics What is ethical varies from one situation and society to another Moral standards should be seen as being individualistic what one person considers to be moral may be judged to be immoral by another person There is too much food advertising directed at children Advertisers use tricks and gimmicks to get children to buy their products Advertising to children makes false claims about utrition content of food products There is too much sugar in the foods advertised to children Advertising teaches children bad eating habits Advertising directed at children leads to family con? ict Attitude toward use of nutritional information Relativism 1. Different types of moralities cannot be compared as to rightness Questions of what is ethical for everyone can never be resolved since what is moral or immoral is up to the individual Moral standards are simply personal rules which indicate how a person should behave, and are not to be applied in making judgments of othersEthical considerations in interpersonal relations are so complex that individuals should be allowed to formulate their own individual codes Rigidly codifying an ethical position that prevents certain types of actions could stand in the way of better human relations and adjustment No rule concerning lying can be formulated whether a lie is tolerable or not permissible totally depends upon the situation Whether a lie is judged to be moral or immoral depends upon the circumstances surrounding the actions 1. 2. 3. 4. I usually pay attention to nutrition information when I see it in an ad or elsewhereI use nutrition information on the label when making most of food selections I dont spend much time in the supermarket see nutrition information I read about nutrition in magazines or books 310 Aysen Bakir and Scott J. Vitell References Ahuja, R. D. , M. Walker and R. Tadepalli 2001, Paternalism, hold in Paternalism, and the Pontius Plate Plight When Researching Children, daybook of Business Ethics 32, 8192. Barnett, T. 2001, Dimensions of Moral volume and Ethical determination Making An Empirical Study, diary of Applied Social Psychology 31(5), 10381057. Bass, K. , T. Barnett and G.Brown 1999, Individual Difference Variables, Ethical Judgments, and Ethical Behavioral Intentions, Business Ethics Quarterly 9(2), 183205. Bolton, R. N. 1983, Modeling the Impact of Television Food Advertising on Chil drens Diets, in J. H. Leigh and C. R. Martin Jr. (eds. ), Current Issues and Research in Advertising (Division of Research, Graduate condition of Business Administration, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI), pp. 173199. Carlson, L. and S. Grossbart 1988, Parental Style and Consumer Socialization of Children, Journal of Consumer Research 15(June), 7794. Crosby, L. A. and S. L.Grossbart 1984, Parental Style Segments and Concern About Childrens Food Advertising, in J. H. Leigh and C. R. Martin Jr. (eds. ), Current Issues Research in Advertising (Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI), pp. 4363. Crosby, L. A. , S. L. Grossbart, J. L. Robb and L. Carlson 1982, Mothers Support For Nutrition tuition A Segmentation Analysis, in B. J. Walker, W. O. Bearden, W. R. Darden, P. E. Murphy, J. R. Nevin, J. C. Olson and B. A. Weitz (eds. ), An Assessment of Marketing Thought and Practice, American Marketing AssociationEducators Proceedings (American Marketing Association, Chicago). Dubinsky, A. J. and B. Loken 1989, Analyzing Ethical finis Making in Marketing, Journal of Business Research 19, 83107. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior An Introduction to possibleness and Research (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA). Forsyth, D. R. 1980, A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(1), 175184. Forsyth, D. R. 1992, Judging the ethics of Business Practices The In? uence of Personal Moral Philosophies, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 461470. Goldberg, M.E. and G. J. Gorn 1974, Childrens Reactions to television Advertising An Experimental Approach, Journal of Consumer Research 1( kinsfolk), 6975. Goldberg, M. E. , G. J. Gorn and W. Gibson 1978, TV Messages for Snack and Breakfast Foods Do They In? uence Childrens Preferences, Journal of Consumer Research 5(September), 7381. Gorn, G. J. and M. E. Goldberg 1977, The Impact of Television Adver tising on Children from Low Income Families, Journal of Consumer Research 4(September), 8688. Grimm, M. 2004, Is Marketing to Kids Ethical? Brandweek 45(14), 4448. Grossbart, S. , L. A. Crosby and J.Robb 1982, Parental Diffusion Roles and Childrens Responses to Nutrition Education, in B. J. Walker, W. O. Bearden, W. R. Darden, P. E. Murphy, J. R. Nevin, J. C. Olson and B. A. Weitz (eds. ), An Assessment of Marketing Thought and Practice, American Marketing Association Educators Proceedings (American Marketing Association, Chicago). Hudson, S. , D. Hudson and J. Peloza 2008, assemble the Parents A Parents Perspective on Product Placement in Childrens Films, Journal of Business Ethics 80, 209304. Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell 1986, A General Theory of Marketing Ethics, Journal of Macromarketing 6, 516.Jardine, A. and L. Wentz 2004, Marketers Brace for Food-Ad Rules, Advertising Age, September 13 issue. Jardine, A. and L. Wentz 2005, Its a Fat World After All, Advertising Age, March 7 i ssue. Jones, T. M. 1991, Ethical Decision-Making by Individuals in Organizations An Issue-Contingent Model, Journal of Management Review 16, 366395. Kotz, D. 2007, How to Win the Weight contend, U. S. News and World Report, September 10 issue. Mallinckrodt, V. and D. Mizerski 2007, The Effects of Playing an Advergame on Young Childrens Perceptions, Preferences, and Requests, Journal of Advertising 36(2), 87100.McKay, B. 2005, Do Ads Make Kids Fat? , Wall Street Journal 245(19). McNeal, J. U. 1998, Tapping the Three Kids Markets, Am Demographics 20(4), 3741. Moore, E. 2004, Children and the Changing World of Advertising, Journal of Business Ethics 52, 161167. Moorman, C. 1998, Market-Level Effects of Information emulous Responses and Consumer Dynamics, Journal of Marketing Research 35(February), 8298. Nelson, M. R. 2002, Recall of Brand Placements in Computer/ characterisation Games, Journal of Advertising Research 42(2), 8092. Oanh Ha, K. 2004, Neopets Sites for Children S tirsControversy, Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, September 14. Park, H. 2005, The Role of Idealism and Relativism as Dispositional Characteristics in the Socially Respon- The Ethics of Food Advertising Targeted Toward Children sible Decision-Making Process, Journal of Business Ethics 56, 8198. Pollay, R. W. and B. Mittal 1993, Heres the Beef Factors, Determinants, and Segments in Consumer Criticism of Advertising, Journal of Marketing 57(July), 99114. Robin, D. P. , R. E. Reidenbach and P. J. Forrest 1996, The perceive Importance of an Ethical Issue as an In? uence on the Ethical Decision-Making of AdManagers, Journal of Business Research 35(1), 1728. Rose, G. M. , V. D. Bush and L. Kahle 1998, The In? uence of Family Communication Patterns on Parental Reactions toward Advertising A Cross topic Examination, Journal of Advertising 27(4), 7185. Singhapakdi, A. , S. Vitell and K. L. Kraft 1996a, Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-Making of Marketing Professionals, Journal of Business Research 36, 245255. Singhapakdi, A. , S. Vitell and K. L. Kraft 1996b, The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social debt instrument A scale Development, Journal of Business Ethics 15(11), 11311140. Singhapakdi, A. S. Vitell, K. C. Rallapalli and K. L. Kraft 1996c, The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility A Scale Development, Journal of Business Ethics 15(11), 11311140. Singhapakdi, A. , S. J. Vitell and G. R. Franke 1999, Antecedents, Consequences and Mediating Effects of 311 Perceived Moral Intensity and Personal Moral Philosophies, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27(1), 1936. Vitell, S. , A. Bakir, J. Paolillo, E. R. Hidalgo, J. Al-Khatib and M. Y. A. Rawwas 2003, Ethical Judgments and Intentions A international Study of Marketing Professionals, Business Ethics A EuropeanReview 12(2), 151171. Wentz, L. 2005, Pop Stops Kids Marketing In Europe, Advertising Age, January 30 issue. York, E. B. 2007, Another Study Slams Food Ads Aimed at Children, Ad vertising Age, September issue. Aysen Bakir Department of Marketing, Illinois secernate University, Campus Box 5590, Normal, IL 61790-5590, U. S. A. E-mail emailprotected edu Scott J. Vitell School of Business Administration, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, U. S. A. E-mail emailprotected olemiss. edu Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.